Kaspar Traulhaine, approximate by D’Stair: David Blaine at your reviewing service!

Kaspar Traulhaine, approximate

by Pablo D’Stair

Reviewed by David Blaine

Published 2009 by Brown Paper Publishing

ISBN 978-1-43829-184-0

152 pp, paperback, $6.95 U.S.

This novel is the paranoid screed of its psychotic first person narrator, Kaspar Traulhaine. 

As the story opens the protagonist notices that someone is watching him.  That observer turns out to be Montgomery Fent, Kaspar’s antagonist, and in the full classic sense of that word, not just the literary. 

D’Stair goes to great lengths to keep his setting generic.  He never relates a proper place name.  In the course of the book he mentions locations such as, “a franchise restaurant,” or “a fast food restaurant,” or “a generic department store.”  The story is set in a city large enough to have subways and metro stations.  I got the feeling that this was a North American city because it mentioned dollars, drug stores and elevators, not Euros, chemists or lifts.  This sense was challenged though, with occasional spellings that were contrary to U.S. English, such as “programme,”  “odours,” and “ice crème.” and also with the mention of a “take away” restaurant.   But in the story’s last few pages I came to believe that this city was situated in the United States, as an arrest is made and the police ask if the apprehended person understands his rights. 

The first person point of view works well, showing us the disability oppressing the narrator.  The trouble with this though, is that after a short while one realizes the narrator is not the least bit reliable.  The reader is trying to assemble facts in his mind with information provided by only one party, and that party is suffering extreme mental defect.  Early on Kaspar admits to killing someone, and Montgomery tortures him by announcing that in three days, he will turn Kaspar in.  But after a bit more reading, it becomes logical to doubt that Kaspar even knows whether he really killed anyone or not, whether Montgomery exists, or if he could even be another personality of the narrator.

The actual monologue is amazing.  D’Stair writes like a poet, sometimes using words and phrases outside their denotation.  Consider,

            “I looked at him, obese, exhausted from his day, hair two licks of

              glaze over his blotchy forehead.”

            “I took the last of my wine in a series of chokes.”

or

            “As I walked, I slouched through my options.”

And sometimes the phrasing is most poetic, such as this line where Kaspar tells us his ears were, “buzzing with a rattle like coins spun underwater.”

In a few places D’Stair conjures up a word of his own device, such as, “…the shumble of his steps.” or “the thack of blood in my ears sounding like feet up the steps.”

At other points the author uses his pen to help the reader conjure the physical anguish this paranoid character is enduring.  This line made me wonder what it would be like to read the story while suffering stomach flu,

            “My stomach gurgled viciously, an insistence of grime tapping to be

              defecated, a sour breath lifting from my gut out in a whispered belch,

              my eyes stinging from the paste of sweat that had been settling on my

              face.”

With writing this graphic, it isn’t surprising that D’Stair uses actual profanity quite minimally.  I don’t think I came across five words that would be censored by American television. 

But the indeterminacies in these pages are many.  Often the narrator states things as “obvious,” or “positive,” when they do not appear so to me, and I keep feeling that perhaps I’ve missed something.  This does hammer home the paranoid effect, but it also leads to another distraction, wondering if Kaspar is also schizophrenic, still wondering if he and his antagonist are one or two. 

As you read the interaction between Kaspar and Montgomery you begin to weigh and judge the acts of each.  This story not only shows the workings of a paranoid mind, but of the interaction between two people suffering different diseases, as Fent is certainly shown to be a sadistic animal.  As I read I kept juggling two or three possible outcomes, hoping to be totally surprised at the ending.  As it turns out, I found the conclusion rather anti-climactic, and many unresolved questions still hung over my head after a second reading.

Learn more about Pablo D’Stair at his blog at http://www.ktapproximate.blogspot.com/. Free copies of Kaspar Traulhaine, approximate are available by e-mailing a request to Pablo at unburiedcomments@gmail.com

David Blaine edits at the Outsider Writers Collective. His third book of poetry, Antisocial, was published in 2009 by Outsider Writers Press.

Published by lenavanelslander

Lena Vanelslander swam many waters. History, Comparative Culture Analysis, Languages, Mythology, Literature, Poetry, too many to sum up. After a life of tribulations the turning point came in her mid twenties: she started to write actively poetry in English. Her melancholic and darkminded nature colour her poems to an individual signature in both time and space. Poems got published in the Stray Branch, Savage Manners, the Delinquent and The Sylvan Echo. Her first chapbook ‘Ma Chanson de Rien du Tout’ has been released in September this year. Her first book of poetry, written with Marilyn Campiz, Quills of Fire, will appear in November 2009. Currently she edits writers' profiles for http://www.gloomcupboard.com and http://www.outsiderwriters.org

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: